Back to basics

Conservation Issues
Roboframer

Re: Back to basics

Post by Roboframer » Tue 01 Jul, 2008 2:14 am

John wrote:Jolly Good Framer #1's framed newspaper experiment tells the story much better than some half understood theory ever could for me.
Bully for you!

It's not a theory - it's a fact - but if JGF#1 can do it in pictures (proving that fact) then biiiiig props!
I believe .................. I tend to get a bit sceptical ..........I want to be shown, ..........for me, Jolly Good Framer #1's experiment has more validity than a ton of scientific mumbo jumbo.
Bully again - some geezer (no disrespect) who has (or I have) proved he does not understand the capabilities/limitations of materials he stocks/uses - does it for you?

The Jolly Good Framer #1

Re: Back to basics

Post by The Jolly Good Framer #1 » Tue 01 Jul, 2008 8:21 am

None taken :)

User avatar
John
Site Admin
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sun 27 Apr, 2003 9:00 pm
Location: Ireland
Organisation: Scenes Picture Framing
Interests: Forums and stuff
Location: Belfast
Contact:

Re: Back to basics

Post by John » Tue 01 Jul, 2008 8:27 am

Perhaps it's the discipline of studying for an engineering degree (Civils, Strathclyde University), which could be described as the real world application of scientific theory, and having worked for many years in that field, that has caused my mumbo-jumbometer to become so highly developed. :)

You know, until the Wright brothers took off, theoreticians would have had us believe that heaver than air flight was impossible. Luckily the 'show me' attitude prevailed.

User avatar
prospero
Posts: 10449
Joined: Tue 05 Jun, 2007 5:16 pm
Location: Lincolnshire

Re: Back to basics

Post by prospero » Tue 01 Jul, 2008 10:13 am

A bit of wisdom from Arthur C. Clark: :shock:

"When a scientist says something is possible, he is usually right. When he says something is immpossible, he is usually wrong"..... :wink:
Watch Out. There's A Humphrey About

framejunkie
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue 13 May, 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Bethnal Green, London
Organisation: framejunkie
Interests: 6.9%APR; 21.3%APR
Location: Bethnal Green, London
Contact:

Re: Back to basics

Post by framejunkie » Tue 01 Jul, 2008 12:03 pm

John wrote:You know, until the Wright brothers took off, theoreticians would have had us believe that heaver than air flight was impossible. Luckily the 'show me' attitude prevailed.
Strictly speaking the theoreticians knew that heavier than air flight was possible. This follows from the fluid dynamics work of Bernoulli in the 18th century. It was the people who failed to grasp the implications of this who thought man would never fly. :nerd:

That said, i totally share your empiricist viewpoint John.

Ever heard the old story that bumble-bees defy the laws of physics? I've heard that used as a justification for all sorts of things and proof of the existence of god. The truth of it is simply that our current models of fluid dynamics work well on the scale of, say, an Airbus A320, but not on the scale of a bee's wing. Its the model being flawed, not the bee being supernatural. The 'Show me' attitude says that bees fly, even if the science is not so sure.
prospero wrote:A bit of wisdom from Arthur C. Clark: :shock:

"When a scientist says something is possible, he is usually right. When he says something is immpossible, he is usually wrong"
Arthur C Clarke also said that any technology sufficiently more advanced than our own is indistinguishable from magic. That's how i feel about museum glass - spooky voodoo science, and not wholly to be trusted. :devil:

The Jolly Good Framer #1

Re: Back to basics

Post by The Jolly Good Framer #1 » Tue 01 Jul, 2008 1:55 pm

I think it is fair to say that the only reason Bumble bees can fly is because no one has told them they can’t.

Did I ever tell you about the time I framed a bumble bee using Tru Vue conservation clear glass? No? Oh well another time maybe.

Image

framejunkie
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue 13 May, 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Bethnal Green, London
Organisation: framejunkie
Interests: 6.9%APR; 21.3%APR
Location: Bethnal Green, London
Contact:

Re: Back to basics

Post by framejunkie » Tue 01 Jul, 2008 4:36 pm

When you say you framed a bee, do you mean in the criminal sense?

Was it a sting operation? :Slap:

User avatar
Bill Henry
Posts: 936
Joined: Wed 28 Mar, 2007 9:38 pm
Location: Litchfield, NH USA
Organisation: Not so much - it's kind of messy.
Interests: Dry mounting dog hair, counting age spots on old people, playing chess with wood elves, scheming to take over the world.
Location: Litchfield, NH USA
Contact:

Re: Back to basics

Post by Bill Henry » Wed 02 Jul, 2008 3:59 pm

framejunkie wrote:When you say you framed a bee, do you mean in the criminal sense?

Was it a sting operation? :Slap:
I remember that; it was in all the newspapers. It stirred up quite a buzz around here.

We should be ashamed of ourselves!
Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't nohow permanent! – Porky Pine

User avatar
John
Site Admin
Posts: 1897
Joined: Sun 27 Apr, 2003 9:00 pm
Location: Ireland
Organisation: Scenes Picture Framing
Interests: Forums and stuff
Location: Belfast
Contact:

Re: Back to basics

Post by John » Wed 02 Jul, 2008 4:23 pm

Bill Henry wrote:It stirred up quite a buzz around here.
A hive of activity?
:)

Spit
Posts: 1127
Joined: Fri 17 Mar, 2006 9:54 pm
Location: Glandwr
Organisation: Framing Mad
Interests: Framing, watercolours & CCFC
Location: Pembrokeshire
Contact:

Re: Back to basics

Post by Spit » Wed 02 Jul, 2008 7:43 pm

Beehive yourselves :twisted:
http://www.classicbikeart.co.uk

Steve.
During business hours : My status

The Jolly Good Framer #1

Re: Back to basics

Post by The Jolly Good Framer #1 » Wed 02 Jul, 2008 10:28 pm

What was this thread about again? :giggle:

User avatar
prospero
Posts: 10449
Joined: Tue 05 Jun, 2007 5:16 pm
Location: Lincolnshire

Re: Back to basics

Post by prospero » Thu 03 Jul, 2008 12:58 am

The Jolly Good Framer #1 wrote:What was this thread about again? :giggle:
...I framed a tangent once. :giggle:
Watch Out. There's A Humphrey About

framejunkie
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue 13 May, 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Bethnal Green, London
Organisation: framejunkie
Interests: 6.9%APR; 21.3%APR
Location: Bethnal Green, London
Contact:

Re: Back to basics

Post by framejunkie » Thu 03 Jul, 2008 9:22 am

The Jolly Good Framer #1 wrote:What was this thread about again? :giggle:
Sorry - i wanted to inject a little mirth into this thread - all the MDF-related agro was bringing me out in hives.

(Edit - just realised we had that one already! :oops: )

Ian Goodman
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat 22 May, 2004 2:07 pm
Location: Ashtonfield NSW Australia
Organisation: Ian Goodman Photography
Interests: Chinese Cooking.
Playing with my Grandchildren
Photoshop Training with Maitland U3A
Location: Ashtonfield - Australia

Re: Back to basics

Post by Ian Goodman » Sun 31 Aug, 2008 12:56 pm

John & Ormond

I too don't like MDF used, you only have to walk into a shop that sells MDF based framing and you are taken back by the smell (formaldehyde).

I know though that Dry Mount Tissue or Film is a barrier to moisture and this is the reason for the non destruction of johns Images in his bathroom.

Had they not been dry mounted then it may have been a different story.

(I am not an MDF user and don't miss it)

Post Reply