I am selling digital photographs and making the frame package as archival as practical.
The print itself is held such a way so that it is not attached to either to window mat or the mount board (the "platform mounting" method as seen here: https://www.theframersforum.com/viewtop ... f=6&t=8798)
The front of the print will be signed and numbered as is commonly done. On the back of the print I want to affix a label for additional info. I'm using Hahnemühle Fine Art 300 gsm photo paper.
Available are archival quality foil-backed, adhesive laser labels I've considered using. However, the product pages for these items say not to use on original artwork or photographs. My guess is those disclaimers are there because affixing anything to original artwork is not strictly "archival."
Two questions, please:
1. Does anyone have an opinion or reason why not to use the above mentioned laser labels other than their use may not be strictly archival?
2. Has anyone here used PVA adhesive on the back of fiber-based photo paper or similar paper?
Thank you!
Attaching label to back of photo?
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu 20 Jun, 2019 11:45 pm
- Location: Dayton, Ohio, US
- Organisation: Jay Snively Photo Art
- Interests: Nature, art, photography, botany, Scrabble
-
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Sat 26 Sep, 2015 8:48 am
- Location: West Wales
- Organisation: George The Framer LLP
- Interests: Gardening, design, electronic music, good food and beverages.
- Contact:
Re: Attaching label to back of photo?
It's up to you, as the artist, to present your work as you choose.
Any sort of adhesive used may discolour over time/react to a change and affect/damage the work.
I have never come across additional info labels used in this way, I have come across certificates of authenticity/paper and process type etc which can be either affixed to the backing board or stored inside the frame package.
Any sort of adhesive used may discolour over time/react to a change and affect/damage the work.
I have never come across additional info labels used in this way, I have come across certificates of authenticity/paper and process type etc which can be either affixed to the backing board or stored inside the frame package.
Justin George GCF(APF)
Insta: georgetheframer
Insta: georgetheframer
-
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: Thu 23 Sep, 2004 8:31 pm
- Location: Detroit, Michigan USA
- Organisation: minoxy, LLC
- Interests: non-fiction knowledge
- Contact:
Re: Attaching label to back of photo?
I am apposed to any "stick-on" label to any art. I would suggest a rubber stamp with "fill in the blanks" for specific title and date info if you use the proper archival ink.
Jerome Feig CPF®
http://www.minoxy.com
http://www.minoxy.com
Re: Attaching label to back of photo?
Sticky labels on the back of artwork are an abomination.
However acid-free/archival/conservation grade the label is, it's the mere fact that it's attached that offends.
If the label had to be removed (mounting or whatever), that's a problem. Why create problems?
It's a 'do not throw stones at this sign' scenario.
However acid-free/archival/conservation grade the label is, it's the mere fact that it's attached that offends.
If the label had to be removed (mounting or whatever), that's a problem. Why create problems?
It's a 'do not throw stones at this sign' scenario.
Watch Out. There's A Humphrey About
- Steve N
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Sat 21 Jul, 2007 2:32 pm
- Location: Somewhere Staple Hill Bristol
- Organisation: Frontier Picture Frames ltd
- Interests: Walking our retired Greyhound,art, falling asleep on sofa in front of the telly
- Location: Now in Bristol
- Contact:
Re: Attaching label to back of photo?
Can't see the reason to stick something to the back of a photo, that if mounted and framed in the manner you have said, it will not be seen by anybody, just stick the label to the back of the frame or the mount package
Steve CEO GCF (020)
Believed in Time Travel since 2035
Proud to sell Ready Made Frames
http://www.frontierpictureframes.com
http://www.designerpicturemounts.com/
Believed in Time Travel since 2035
Proud to sell Ready Made Frames
http://www.frontierpictureframes.com
http://www.designerpicturemounts.com/
-
- Posts: 11014
- Joined: Sat 25 Mar, 2006 8:40 pm
- Location: Devon, U.K.
- Organisation: The Dartmoor Gallery
- Interests: Lost causes, saving and restoring old things, learning something every day
- Location: Glorious Devon
Re: Attaching label to back of photo?
You are selling your photos as signed and numbered prints. So the presence of the number would be indicting that they probably are from a limited edition and are a collectible item and then you are planning to stick a lable onto the back which is clearly produced on a laser printer, which would be just want you expect on something that is mass produced. Do you expect your discerning customers, who are looking to buy something both special and of value as a collectible item, to be impressed with. The purists will expect something with real class, I don't think that this label expresses much in regards to class, or perhaps good taste in how to indicate that your photos are really special.
Another point, which also needs to be considered is the fact that over the years, that which was originally new and looked new, will over time lose a bit of it's apparent newness, but will the visible area of the photo age slightly differently where the label has been fixed behind it. No one is suggesting that the labels are not made of a archival quality materials, but there is not a uniformity of the material all the way across the rear face of this photo. You don't know if this will cause any difference, or if this will be a problem and I don't know either, but if you were a trained conservator, you would not be taking any unnecessary chances. Excellence is not just an aspect of your marketing image, but it is also your whole state of mind towards your product.
Reputations for excellence come from customers discerning that the evidence of the finished product is one of no compromise.
I'm a bit puzzled by the reference to the use of PVA glue to the rear of the photo, as this is clearly not fully reversible and therefore fails one of the most important criteria for something being presented according to archival, or conservation standards.
Finally, how much class does a little sticky label imply? Not a lot! However a certificate of conformity, stating this this is an genuine original photographic print by yourself, speaks volumes. I think a much superior indication of class and of it's status as a collectible item, if I may say so1
Another point, which also needs to be considered is the fact that over the years, that which was originally new and looked new, will over time lose a bit of it's apparent newness, but will the visible area of the photo age slightly differently where the label has been fixed behind it. No one is suggesting that the labels are not made of a archival quality materials, but there is not a uniformity of the material all the way across the rear face of this photo. You don't know if this will cause any difference, or if this will be a problem and I don't know either, but if you were a trained conservator, you would not be taking any unnecessary chances. Excellence is not just an aspect of your marketing image, but it is also your whole state of mind towards your product.
Reputations for excellence come from customers discerning that the evidence of the finished product is one of no compromise.
I'm a bit puzzled by the reference to the use of PVA glue to the rear of the photo, as this is clearly not fully reversible and therefore fails one of the most important criteria for something being presented according to archival, or conservation standards.
Finally, how much class does a little sticky label imply? Not a lot! However a certificate of conformity, stating this this is an genuine original photographic print by yourself, speaks volumes. I think a much superior indication of class and of it's status as a collectible item, if I may say so1
Mark Lacey
“Life is short. Art long. Opportunity is fleeting. Experience treacherous. Judgement difficult.”
― Geoffrey Chaucer
“Life is short. Art long. Opportunity is fleeting. Experience treacherous. Judgement difficult.”
― Geoffrey Chaucer
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu 20 Jun, 2019 11:45 pm
- Location: Dayton, Ohio, US
- Organisation: Jay Snively Photo Art
- Interests: Nature, art, photography, botany, Scrabble
Re: Attaching label to back of photo?
I appreciate all the thoughtful replies (especially Mark's) - you all have helped me make an informed decision. I'll include minimal information hand written on the back of the print and any extended information will be on the mount board.
As to the reason for including with a print information that no one would see - should the print ever be remounted, the information will stay with the print.
Thank you for your useful responses.
As to the reason for including with a print information that no one would see - should the print ever be remounted, the information will stay with the print.
Thank you for your useful responses.
Re: Attaching label to back of photo?
Wise move. Write it in pencil and not where the image area is if possible.
And don't press on too hard.
And don't press on too hard.
Watch Out. There's A Humphrey About