copyright question

Financial, legal, advertising, pricing, marketing, accountancy, bookkeeping, employment, taxation, etc.
Post Reply
CanvasChris
Posts: 622
Joined: Tue 04 Mar, 2008 11:05 pm
Location: Brixworth
Organisation: Retired Picture Framerand Printer
Interests: mountain biking & drinking beer.... not necessarily in that order!
Location: Northampton

copyright question

Post by CanvasChris »

I have been asked to print a couple of images that are by the artist John Bauer. He is the Trolls and Fairy's artist.

They appear to be scans of prints due to the moire. He died 1918

Done a search and came across this http://inventors.about.com/od/copyright ... ration.htm which says that if it was published prior to 1923 then it's in the public domain.

What is your opinion....am I in the clear?

Not much profit in it so wouldn't matter if I didn't.

Thanks in advance...

Chris
Canvas, Acrylic, Photographic, Fine Art Printing & Framing
http://www.prophotosolutions.co.uk
CanvasChris
Posts: 622
Joined: Tue 04 Mar, 2008 11:05 pm
Location: Brixworth
Organisation: Retired Picture Framerand Printer
Interests: mountain biking & drinking beer.... not necessarily in that order!
Location: Northampton

Re: copyright question

Post by CanvasChris »

Think I might have answered my own question... :Slap: :Slap: :Slap:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:John_Bauer_1915.jpg

See the bottom of this page.
Canvas, Acrylic, Photographic, Fine Art Printing & Framing
http://www.prophotosolutions.co.uk
User avatar
Steve Goodall
Posts: 803
Joined: Thu 08 May, 2008 4:22 pm
Location: Up North
Organisation: Wessex Pictures Group
Interests: Gothic Punk / Man City / Photography...

Re: copyright question

Post by Steve Goodall »

This is a "perfect subject" for one of those FATG members who have joined the forum recently to help a "fellow" forum member with.

So let's have some professional advice on copyright - from the experts - please - pretty please - pretty please with ribbons on....

Thanks in advance ;)
It's not a secret - I work for Wessex Pictures & I'm here to help!!! you can email me at steveg@wessexpictures.com or call me on 07585 138566
User avatar
Framerpicture
Posts: 898
Joined: Thu 18 Jan, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Somerset
Organisation: Picture Framing
Interests: Mountain Biking, Walking,
Contact:

Re: copyright question

Post by Framerpicture »

I am aware that images are copyright free 70 years after the artist's death but is it ok to copy from a print that may have beeen published subsequently to that or must you always copy from an original?
For example, Cecil Aldin died in 1935. More than 70 years ago so you would assume he is copyright free, but if a print was copied that was published in 1960 by a publishing company ,(bearing in mind the copyright for the image is automatically retained by the artist unless otherwise agreed), would that be ok?
http://www.churchgategallery.co.uk/
Follow us on Twitter@PorlockArt
Max Roberts
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri 25 Feb, 2011 9:47 pm
Location: Leeds
Organisation: Headrow Gallery, Leeds
Interests: Business, Music of all genres, art, aviation & travel
Contact:

Re: copyright question

Post by Max Roberts »

I don't have any definitive answer, but you're right about the 70 year rule after the death of the artist. Does the publishing company still exist because they might have entered in to some separate copyright arrangement? I'm not quite sure what is meant by all the inverted commas in Steve's contributuion, but if you want a guild angle on the subject, go to www.fineart.co.uk. If you're a member, sign in and type in "Copyright". You'll find a load of relevant pdfs. I think you can see the same articles as a none member, but the search facility is probably more consumer relevant. I expect it's one of the bonuses of being a member!
JFeig
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu 23 Sep, 2004 8:31 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan USA
Organisation: minoxy, LLC
Interests: non-fiction knowledge
Contact:

Re: copyright question

Post by JFeig »

Here in the States, thank you Mr. Walt Disney for having set 1923 as a copyright date for everything. He started his business about that time.

HOWEVER, if an image was purchased by a museum they have copyrights to the images they take of a work of art.
Jerome Feig CPF®
http://www.minoxy.com
User avatar
Steve Goodall
Posts: 803
Joined: Thu 08 May, 2008 4:22 pm
Location: Up North
Organisation: Wessex Pictures Group
Interests: Gothic Punk / Man City / Photography...

Re: copyright question

Post by Steve Goodall »

Thanks Max - nothing "sinister" in the inverted commas - I just "love" them - in an "eighties" kind if way...
It's not a secret - I work for Wessex Pictures & I'm here to help!!! you can email me at steveg@wessexpictures.com or call me on 07585 138566
Graysalchemy

Re: copyright question

Post by Graysalchemy »

Surely if it was taken from a print or reproduction then the publisher will hold some form of copyright on that reproduction as they will have entered a financial agreement for reproduction rights so you will be infringing that copyright.
CanvasChris
Posts: 622
Joined: Tue 04 Mar, 2008 11:05 pm
Location: Brixworth
Organisation: Retired Picture Framerand Printer
Interests: mountain biking & drinking beer.... not necessarily in that order!
Location: Northampton

Re: copyright question

Post by CanvasChris »

The image is tagged as 'in the public domain' here... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:John_Bauer_1915.jpg

so would that be Ok?
Canvas, Acrylic, Photographic, Fine Art Printing & Framing
http://www.prophotosolutions.co.uk
Not your average framer
Posts: 11014
Joined: Sat 25 Mar, 2006 8:40 pm
Location: Devon, U.K.
Organisation: The Dartmoor Gallery
Interests: Lost causes, saving and restoring old things, learning something every day
Location: Glorious Devon

Re: copyright question

Post by Not your average framer »

If the artist sold a liecence, or the reproduction rights to a publisher, then it would depend upon a number of factors and conditions. This would include the terms and conditions of the original agreement between the artist and the publisher, such as if the publishers rights included ongoing exclusive rights and these were secured by payment they would still be legally enforcable. Publishers often exercise the option to re-new and re-assert their contract rights.

Attempting to re-publish an artwork from a printed image is also another way of getting into trouble, because the colour separation and lithography work was paid for by the publisher, this is their rightful property and I can't see how this can ever be argued to be in the public domain.

The only honest and legal way of doing something like this is to purchase a liecence to publish from whoever has the legal right to offer such a liecence. If you are not permitted to have access to the original for the express purpose of photographically taking a copy for the purposes of origination and reproduction, then you are stealing someone elses rights, either directly, or by implication.
Mark Lacey

“Life is short. Art long. Opportunity is fleeting. Experience treacherous. Judgement difficult.”
― Geoffrey Chaucer
CanvasChris
Posts: 622
Joined: Tue 04 Mar, 2008 11:05 pm
Location: Brixworth
Organisation: Retired Picture Framerand Printer
Interests: mountain biking & drinking beer.... not necessarily in that order!
Location: Northampton

Re: copyright question

Post by CanvasChris »

Many thanks for all your feedback.

It certainly is a grey area and to be on the safe side I have told the client that I cannot print this.

Chris
Canvas, Acrylic, Photographic, Fine Art Printing & Framing
http://www.prophotosolutions.co.uk
Graysalchemy

Re: copyright question

Post by Graysalchemy »

Best option I think Chris, better losing out on a small order than loosing your reputation and integrity.
User avatar
IFGL
Posts: 3087
Joined: Sun 06 May, 2012 5:27 pm
Location: Sheffield UK
Organisation: Inframe Gallery Ltd
Interests: Films ,music and art, my wife and kids are pretty cool too.
Location: Sheffield
Contact:

Re: copyright question

Post by IFGL »

In the UK you can not copy someone's copy as the secondary copy has a copyright regardless of the original being public domain . hope that makes sense .
Unless the copy is now public domain.
Also anything you scan or photograph you hold the copyright. but only in the UK
misterdiy
Posts: 885
Joined: Sun 13 Jun, 2010 9:15 pm
Location: Isle of Wight
Organisation: Decormount
Interests: Picture framing, mount-cutting, photoshop et al
Location: Isle of Wight
Contact:

Re: copyright question

Post by misterdiy »

So hypothetically then, if I scan and print a few copies for an artist who subsequently dies and his work becomes famous - does that mean that I have the copyright on the images I have scanned or his estate?
User avatar
IFGL
Posts: 3087
Joined: Sun 06 May, 2012 5:27 pm
Location: Sheffield UK
Organisation: Inframe Gallery Ltd
Interests: Films ,music and art, my wife and kids are pretty cool too.
Location: Sheffield
Contact:

Re: copyright question

Post by IFGL »

Lol no. you can only print them for the artist or whoever owns his copyright . but if you kept the original for 70 years then scanned it you would own the copyright on the scan . again this is only law in the UK .In American law you would not own the copyright on a scan of a public domain image .
Ryan Montgomery
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun 15 Apr, 2012 6:25 pm
Location: Northern Ireland
Organisation: None
Interests: Photography

Re: copyright question

Post by Ryan Montgomery »

Hiya,

If you owned the original for 70 years after the artists death you could copy away, the copyright then passes to you or whoever happens to own it at that point.

In short, you can't print it without breaking copyright laws.
User avatar
IFGL
Posts: 3087
Joined: Sun 06 May, 2012 5:27 pm
Location: Sheffield UK
Organisation: Inframe Gallery Ltd
Interests: Films ,music and art, my wife and kids are pretty cool too.
Location: Sheffield
Contact:

Re: copyright question

Post by IFGL »

The point is , op asked if he could copy a print of a now public domain image that was done in 1965 .the answer is no,not in the UK . as the act of copying the image holds its own copyright .I believe the UK is unique in this rulethe act of pressing a button on any piece of equipment holds a artistic license no matter what the skill or intention of the pressor .

An example of this is :-
N
At a wedding the couple to be married leaves disposable cameras on the tables, anyone who pics one of these up and takes a snap holds the copyright to that image .not the owner of the cameras .
User avatar
IFGL
Posts: 3087
Joined: Sun 06 May, 2012 5:27 pm
Location: Sheffield UK
Organisation: Inframe Gallery Ltd
Interests: Films ,music and art, my wife and kids are pretty cool too.
Location: Sheffield
Contact:

Re: copyright question

Post by IFGL »

To mrdiy unless there is a contract to say otherwise,you would own a limited copyright meaning you can't print without the estates permission but they can't use your copy without your permission,so long as you had permission to copy it in the first place .b
Sorry for my lack of clarification in previous posts. VI usually can't be bothered willing answers
User avatar
IFGL
Posts: 3087
Joined: Sun 06 May, 2012 5:27 pm
Location: Sheffield UK
Organisation: Inframe Gallery Ltd
Interests: Films ,music and art, my wife and kids are pretty cool too.
Location: Sheffield
Contact:

Re: copyright question

Post by IFGL »

Re checking where did i get 1965 from? I think it was roboframers post about menus. I think I should lay off the beer .
Post Reply