GLazing for a large (ish) frame...

Get help and framing advice from the framing community
Post Reply
lawrieh
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat 12 Apr, 2014 2:17 pm
Location: London
Organisation: Lawrie
Interests: Web design, photography, cycling, big blue skies and making....

GLazing for a large (ish) frame...

Post by lawrieh »

I have been asked to frame a picture that is 130cm x 100cm which would be the largest frame I have done to date. I have been using 2mm float glass up until now on frames up to 90cmx70cm in size.

Does this larger size mean I should switch to 3mm or thicker glass or possibly to a "plastic" glazing material?

If the switch to "plastic" is needed where do I start?

Styrene Acrylic (cast or extruded?) (2mm or 3mm?)

Also does anyone have any guidelines mouldings, ie minimum width in order to provide sufficient structural integrity? do you ever put a brace between the 2 longest edges to keep the sides from bowing or will backing tape be sufficient?

Thanks

Lawrie
User avatar
prospero
Posts: 11498
Joined: Tue 05 Jun, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: Lincolnshire

Re: GLazing for a large (ish) frame...

Post by prospero »

At that size I would be happy to use 2mm glass. As long as it's in a sturdy enough frame and the wall hangings are up to the job. 3mm is arguably stronger, but in real life anything that would break 2mm would break 3mm. And then you have 50% more weight of deadly shards.

If safety is an issue, then go for acrylic. But you would need 3mm or thicker. So weight saving would be minimal. There are other problems with acrylic. Cost for one. And also scratching.

If you have to put braces on the frame to stop it bowing I would say that you need a bigger moulding.
Watch Out. There's A Humphrey About
lawrieh
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat 12 Apr, 2014 2:17 pm
Location: London
Organisation: Lawrie
Interests: Web design, photography, cycling, big blue skies and making....

Re: GLazing for a large (ish) frame...

Post by lawrieh »

Thanks Prospero

2mm would be best for me and customer

The frame is for a modern elegant photo so it should be fairly indiscreet. Should the moulding be structurally resistant to flex in all dimensions or is a particular dimension more important than others? e.g bowing away from side of glass, torsional/twisting, bending along the same plane as the glass? any recommendations for rough size of moulding?

I have been using double D rings for each side of frames up until now with 5/8" screws, if this is borderline are there any other options other than something like a D ring with 3 screw holes ?
User avatar
IFGL
Posts: 3087
Joined: Sun 06 May, 2012 5:27 pm
Location: Sheffield UK
Organisation: Inframe Gallery Ltd
Interests: Films ,music and art, my wife and kids are pretty cool too.
Location: Sheffield
Contact:

Re: GLazing for a large (ish) frame...

Post by IFGL »

Strap hangers, for me it would have to be a 70 mm + wide frame with a 30 mm + depth in a decent wood if I was going to use 2 mm glass, which I regularly do in pictures of that size.
User avatar
prospero
Posts: 11498
Joined: Tue 05 Jun, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: Lincolnshire

Re: GLazing for a large (ish) frame...

Post by prospero »

It's not so much the width/depth of the moulding. It's more the area of the cross section. The bigger it is, the more glue area. But when you get to glazed frames of this size it's sometimes better to take the frame out of the equation altogether and use a sub-frame. This type of construction makes for great strength and stability.


http://theframersforum.com/viewtopic.ph ... ilit=jobby


Makes hanging easier. At this size it's wise to abandon all thoughts of rings and wires.
Watch Out. There's A Humphrey About
Post Reply