Page 1 of 1

man bought £100,000 fake -and it must be destroyed

Posted: Sun 02 Feb, 2014 7:05 pm
by kev@frames
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/ ... rnace.html

am I the only one who saw the funny side of this?

Re: man bought £100,000 fake -and it must be destroyed

Posted: Mon 03 Feb, 2014 10:17 am
by An Old Master
Sorry, but I don't think it's remotely funny. It's just a pity the guy's son started digging and didn't leave sleeping dogs lie. I'm all for bringing art fraud to the fore, as we have had more forgeries in for restoration than is comfortable, but I don't think laughing at such disappointment has much to commend it.

Re: man bought £100,000 fake -and it must be destroyed

Posted: Mon 03 Feb, 2014 12:23 pm
by prospero
Forgery or not, the guy must have actually liked the painting. He paid for it. What right has anyone to destroy it?

There are more forgeries in public galleries than anyone knows. Or ever will for sure. Some forgers have become so notorious that people actually collect their forgeries. With the result that others are forging the forgeries.


btw. I use the word 'forgery' rather than 'fake'. A fake is not intended to deceive.

Re: man bought £100,000 fake -and it must be destroyed

Posted: Mon 03 Feb, 2014 12:33 pm
by An Old Master
I had a customer some years ago that had several million pounds worth of oil paintings in his house and was getting increasingly worried about security. I put him in touch with a superb copier; the guy copied all the paintings for £100k, my customer sold all the originals at auction, he still had the paintings on his walls, only he, the copier and me knew about it amd he was several mill. better off. Faking can be very profitable.

Re: man bought £100,000 fake -and it must be destroyed

Posted: Wed 05 Feb, 2014 12:56 pm
by Kwik Picture Framing
was it in a frame?

Re: man bought £100,000 fake -and it must be destroyed

Posted: Fri 07 Feb, 2014 11:15 am
by An Old Master
Why the past tense?

Re: man bought £100,000 fake -and it must be destroyed

Posted: Fri 07 Feb, 2014 11:37 am
by prospero
The guy ought to photo the painting and keep knocking out full-size canvas prints. I reckon he would soon get his money back, given the world-wide publicity he is getting. :lol:

Copyright? Well if the forger shows up with a writ, more power to him. :giggle:

Re: man bought £100,000 fake -and it must be destroyed

Posted: Fri 07 Feb, 2014 1:12 pm
by An Old Master
I do like that idea.