Optical illusion
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Wed 06 Jan, 2010 8:01 pm
- Location: Yorkshire England
- Organisation: Trinity Framing
- Interests: Classic Tractors, Honda Blackbird, Eunos, anything with an engine
- Contact:
Optical illusion
Or my eyesight.
I've done a double mount 6mm showing and when put it against the wall arghh - it looked 6 at the top but less at the bottom. Turned it upside down and blow me down the thinner bit stayed at te bottom. Time for glasses.
I've done a double mount 6mm showing and when put it against the wall arghh - it looked 6 at the top but less at the bottom. Turned it upside down and blow me down the thinner bit stayed at te bottom. Time for glasses.
Do not be afraid of strangers, for thereby many have entertained angels unawares.
Re: Optical illusion
Somebody will correct me I'm sure, but I believe it's parallax. I've spent minutes chasing mounts round 90 degrees at a time convinced something was wrong.
Dave
Dave
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Wed 06 Jan, 2010 8:01 pm
- Location: Yorkshire England
- Organisation: Trinity Framing
- Interests: Classic Tractors, Honda Blackbird, Eunos, anything with an engine
- Contact:
Re: Optical illusion
Chopping device or an illness Dave?
Do not be afraid of strangers, for thereby many have entertained angels unawares.
Re: Optical illusion
Familiar feature to shooters, things appearing different relative to each other when viewed from different angles. Imagine looking at a row of telegraph poles whilst driving past them. They stay where they are but appear to move relative to each other as your viewing angle changes.
Dave
Dave
Re: Optical illusion
It's a well known illusion. All to do with how we perceive things as 'stable' and therefore safe. Ask someone to draw a triangle for you. 99.9% of the time they will do it apex-up. Apex-down is unstable and therefore gives you a subconscious feeling of instability.
Same reason for bottom-weighting mount borders. Do them equal and the top will always look wider. In theory we should also bottom-weight double mount reveals, but no one does.

Same reason for bottom-weighting mount borders. Do them equal and the top will always look wider. In theory we should also bottom-weight double mount reveals, but no one does.

Watch Out. There's A Humphrey About
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Tue 09 Oct, 2012 10:13 pm
- Location: Ireland
- Organisation: picture framing services
- Interests: framing, photography, table tennis
- Contact:
Re: Optical illusion
Bottom should be approx; 10 per cent greater than top margin. 6mm at top, about7mm at bottom solves the illusion.
-
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Tue 28 Jun, 2011 1:32 pm
- Location: BERKSHIRE
- Organisation: ART233, GALLERY/FRAME SHOP
- Interests: COLLECTING & RESTORING OLD TOYS...
Re: Optical illusion
The trouble is with that idea, Kevin, is that not everyone sees things in the same way...
Re: Optical illusion
A lot depends on the nature of the mount and the lighting conditions. How extreme the difference in tone/colour between top mount and bottom etc.
Watch Out. There's A Humphrey About
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Wed 06 Jan, 2010 8:01 pm
- Location: Yorkshire England
- Organisation: Trinity Framing
- Interests: Classic Tractors, Honda Blackbird, Eunos, anything with an engine
- Contact:
Re: Optical illusion
Spot on Prospero, it was a dark brown bottom layer and cream top, which did accentuate it.
Do not be afraid of strangers, for thereby many have entertained angels unawares.
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Sun 22 Jun, 2008 7:11 pm
- Location: Scotland
- Organisation: Dumfries & Galloway
- Interests: Photography, Colour Management, Sea Fishing
Re: Optical illusion
I've never noticed this phonominium with double mounts, having said that I never go above 4mm.kevin wrote:Bottom should be approx; 10 per cent greater than top margin. 6mm at top, about7mm at bottom solves the illusion.
I have however encountered that 'slipped down' look with mounts/matts but have always allowed for it by making the bottom slightly wider.
Is 10% a calculated amount, perhaps devised by an ancient Greek scholar or is it a figure generally agreed by framers? or neither!
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Sun 22 Jun, 2008 7:11 pm
- Location: Scotland
- Organisation: Dumfries & Galloway
- Interests: Photography, Colour Management, Sea Fishing
Re: Optical illusion
This was a serious question.guzzijim wrote:[quote="kevin"
Is 10% a calculated amount, perhaps devised by an ancient Greek scholar or is it a figure generally agreed by framers? or neither!