Optical illusion

Discuss Picture Framing topics.

PLEASE USE THE HELP SECTION
WHEN SEEKING OR OFFERING HELP!
Post Reply
Trinity
Posts: 695
Joined: Wed 06 Jan, 2010 8:01 pm
Location: Yorkshire England
Organisation: Trinity Framing
Interests: Classic Tractors, Honda Blackbird, Eunos, anything with an engine
Contact:

Optical illusion

Post by Trinity »

Or my eyesight.
I've done a double mount 6mm showing and when put it against the wall arghh - it looked 6 at the top but less at the bottom. Turned it upside down and blow me down the thinner bit stayed at te bottom. Time for glasses.
Do not be afraid of strangers, for thereby many have entertained angels unawares.
Dave
Posts: 497
Joined: Sat 24 Feb, 2007 5:55 pm
Location: Norfolk

Re: Optical illusion

Post by Dave »

Somebody will correct me I'm sure, but I believe it's parallax. I've spent minutes chasing mounts round 90 degrees at a time convinced something was wrong.

Dave
Trinity
Posts: 695
Joined: Wed 06 Jan, 2010 8:01 pm
Location: Yorkshire England
Organisation: Trinity Framing
Interests: Classic Tractors, Honda Blackbird, Eunos, anything with an engine
Contact:

Re: Optical illusion

Post by Trinity »

Chopping device or an illness Dave?
Do not be afraid of strangers, for thereby many have entertained angels unawares.
Dave
Posts: 497
Joined: Sat 24 Feb, 2007 5:55 pm
Location: Norfolk

Re: Optical illusion

Post by Dave »

Familiar feature to shooters, things appearing different relative to each other when viewed from different angles. Imagine looking at a row of telegraph poles whilst driving past them. They stay where they are but appear to move relative to each other as your viewing angle changes.

Dave
User avatar
prospero
Posts: 11613
Joined: Tue 05 Jun, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: Lincolnshire

Re: Optical illusion

Post by prospero »

It's a well known illusion. All to do with how we perceive things as 'stable' and therefore safe. Ask someone to draw a triangle for you. 99.9% of the time they will do it apex-up. Apex-down is unstable and therefore gives you a subconscious feeling of instability. :?

Same reason for bottom-weighting mount borders. Do them equal and the top will always look wider. In theory we should also bottom-weight double mount reveals, but no one does. :lol:
Watch Out. There's A Humphrey About
kevin
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue 09 Oct, 2012 10:13 pm
Location: Ireland
Organisation: picture framing services
Interests: framing, photography, table tennis
Contact:

Re: Optical illusion

Post by kevin »

Bottom should be approx; 10 per cent greater than top margin. 6mm at top, about7mm at bottom solves the illusion.
233ART
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue 28 Jun, 2011 1:32 pm
Location: BERKSHIRE
Organisation: ART233, GALLERY/FRAME SHOP
Interests: COLLECTING & RESTORING OLD TOYS...

Re: Optical illusion

Post by 233ART »

The trouble is with that idea, Kevin, is that not everyone sees things in the same way...
User avatar
prospero
Posts: 11613
Joined: Tue 05 Jun, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: Lincolnshire

Re: Optical illusion

Post by prospero »

A lot depends on the nature of the mount and the lighting conditions. How extreme the difference in tone/colour between top mount and bottom etc.
Watch Out. There's A Humphrey About
Trinity
Posts: 695
Joined: Wed 06 Jan, 2010 8:01 pm
Location: Yorkshire England
Organisation: Trinity Framing
Interests: Classic Tractors, Honda Blackbird, Eunos, anything with an engine
Contact:

Re: Optical illusion

Post by Trinity »

Spot on Prospero, it was a dark brown bottom layer and cream top, which did accentuate it.
Do not be afraid of strangers, for thereby many have entertained angels unawares.
guzzijim
Posts: 286
Joined: Sun 22 Jun, 2008 7:11 pm
Location: Scotland
Organisation: Dumfries & Galloway
Interests: Photography, Colour Management, Sea Fishing

Re: Optical illusion

Post by guzzijim »

kevin wrote:Bottom should be approx; 10 per cent greater than top margin. 6mm at top, about7mm at bottom solves the illusion.
I've never noticed this phonominium with double mounts, having said that I never go above 4mm.

I have however encountered that 'slipped down' look with mounts/matts but have always allowed for it by making the bottom slightly wider.

Is 10% a calculated amount, perhaps devised by an ancient Greek scholar or is it a figure generally agreed by framers? or neither!
guzzijim
Posts: 286
Joined: Sun 22 Jun, 2008 7:11 pm
Location: Scotland
Organisation: Dumfries & Galloway
Interests: Photography, Colour Management, Sea Fishing

Re: Optical illusion

Post by guzzijim »

guzzijim wrote:[quote="kevin"

Is 10% a calculated amount, perhaps devised by an ancient Greek scholar or is it a figure generally agreed by framers? or neither!
This was a serious question.
Post Reply